Glidewell Laboratories
Dentist - Lab bruxzir implants snoring My Account
Dentist Services Lab Services Patient Education My Account
   
 

Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
 
A Technique for Obtaining Accurate Full-Arch Implant Impressions
Take a Test | Online Magazine

Course Objectives (2 CE Credits)

Achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis is critical when dealing with implant-borne restorations. Thanks to CAD/CAM technology, extremely accurate implant frameworks can now be virtually designed and milled from a solid block of titanium. To optimize the fit of the prosthesis, clinical and laboratory procedures must mirror this high level of accuracy. Outlining a simple procedure for obtaining accurate full-arch implant impressions, this Clinical Tip describes how to:

  • Create a sectioned implant verification jig (IVJ)
  • Fabricate a custom impression tray
  • Lute the sectioned IVJ together intraorally
  • Verify the fit of the IVJ
  • Take the final impression
  • Fabricate the master cast

Summary

Even though CAD/CAM implant frameworks have greatly improved and simplified restoring full-arch cases, an extremely accurate impression and master cast are still critical for achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis. Detailed is a highly predictable technique for obtaining accurate full-arch impressions.


References

  1. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:74–8.
  2. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:537–52.
  3. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:620–5.
  4. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:7–13.
  5. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843–8.
  6. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399–410.
  7. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:185–94.
  8. Cobb GW, Metcalf AM, Parsell D, Reeves GW. An alternate treatment method for a fixed-detachable hybrid prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:239–43.
  9. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby. 1999;69:549–93.
  10. Watzek G. Endosseus Implants: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Chicago: Quintessence. 1996:342–54.
  11. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:194–200.
  12. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:285–91.
  13. Chee W, Jivaj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J. 2006;201(7):429–32.
  14. Cabral LM, Guedes CG. Comparative analysis of four impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent. 2007;16(2).
  15. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:216–22.
  16. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:448–55.

 

 
   
Policies & Warranty   USA Flag
 
 
    Visit the aveoTSD website Visit the BruxZir website Visit the Inclusive Dental Implants website Glidewell Dental Lab Mobile Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on Facebook Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on Twitter Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on iTunes Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on YouTube
aveoTSD BruxZir Inclusive FastScan H/S Splint Facebook Twitter iTunes YouTube