Dental Continuing Education Course - Clinical Case Report: 3.0 mm Diameter Mini Implants for Retention of a Mandibular Overdenture - Glidewell Dental Lab Continuing Education

About the Technology Center Upcoming Courses Register for Courses Visit the Technology Center Photo Tour Technology Course Survey

CE Course Index About CE Credit Meet Our Educators

Course Listings Course Calendar

Clinical Education Materials

Case Study Gallery

Before & After Gallery

Clinical Product Tips

Clinical Case Report: 3.0 mm Diameter Mini Implants for Retention of a Mandibular Overdenture
Take a Test | Online Magazine

Course Objectives (2 CE Credits)

When using small-diameter implants to retain an overdenture, it is critical for the clinician to be aware of the indications and contraindications of this type of implant. However, when selected and used properly in appropriate cases, mini implants can provide an excellent solution to denture instability. Achieving maximum stability of the overdenture is dependent on several factors, such as:

Condition of patient's existing denture
Planning and placement of the implants
Primary stability of the implants
Vertical and horizontal space

Summary

It is important for a clinician to be aware of the indications and contraindications of small-diameter implants when using this type of implant to treat a patient. When used properly in appropriate cases, this type of implant can prove to be an excellent solution for retention of an overdenture.

References

Christensen GJ. The 'mini'-implant has arrived. J Am Dent Assoc. 2006;137(3):387-90.

Bryant SR, MacDonald-Jankowski D, Kim K. Does the type of implant prosthesis affect outcomes for the completely edentulous arch? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007;22 Suppl:11739.

Bulard RA, Vance JB. Multi-clinic evaluation using mini-dental implants for long-term denture stabilization: a preliminary biometric evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005;26(12):89-297.

Rodriguez AM, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Survival of various implant-supported prosthesis designs following 36 months of clinical function. Ann Periodontol. 2000;5(1):101-08.

Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-eight-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(6):919-28.

Boucher CO, Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 7th ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1975.

Brewer AA, Morrow RM. Overdentures. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 1980.

Shipping \| Company \| Careers \| Contact Us \| Conventions \| Downloads \| Site Map	Policies & Warranty