Glidewell Laboratories
Dentist - Lab bruxzir implants snoring My Account
Dentist Services Lab Services Patient Education My Account
   
 


WINTER 2011 ISSUE
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule



Blue Rule
Blue Rule
Blue Rule



Blue Rule
Blue Rule
 
 
 

A Technique for Obtaining Accurate Full-Arch Implant Impressions



OVERVIEW

Clinical Tip: Even though CAD/CAM implant frameworks have greatly improved and simplified restoring full-arch cases, an extremely accurate impression and master cast are still critical for achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis. Dr. Bradley Bockhorst details a highly predictable technique for obtaining accurate full-arch impressions. Included with the article are a photo essay and a clinical video with accompanying free CE test.
 
 
bockhorst   Bradley C. Bockhorst, DMD
Director of Clinical Technologies, Glidewell Laboratories
Newport Beach, Calif.
800-521-0576

inclusivemagazine@glidewelldental.com
 
After receiving his dental degree from Washington University School of Dental Medicine, Dr. Bradley Bockhorst served as a Navy Dental Officer. Dr. Bockhorst is Director of Clinical Technologies at Glidewell Laboratories, where he oversees Inclusive® Digital Implant Treatment Planning Services and is editor-in-chief and clinical editor of Inclusive magazine. A member of the CDA, ADA, Academy of Osseointegration, International Congress of Oral Implantologists and American Academy of Implant Dentistry, Dr. Bockhorst lectures internationally on an array of dental implant topics. He maintains a private practice focused on implant prosthetics in Mission Viejo, Calif.
Clinical footage provided by Drs. Hugh Murray and Al Manesh
Running Time: 4:50 - HD Quicktime Download (Right Click)
Inclusive Magazine iTunes Podcast
You must have iTunes installed on your computer to view this link. Click here to subscribe in iTunes.
Inclusive Magazine RSS Feed
Click here to subscribe to RSS feed link.

PAGE 1 OF 4

One of the most critical requirements for implant-borne restorations is a passive fit of the prosthesis. If this is not obtained, the resulting stress could result in loosening of the abutment screws or, in the worst-case scenario, damage to the implants or surrounding bone.1-7 In the past, casting large frameworks resulted in inherent errors. Frequently, the restorative dentist would cut and solder the framework until a passive, stress-free fit was achieved.8-10 With the evolution of CAD/CAM technology in dentistry, frameworks can now be virtually designed and milled to an extreme level of accuracy (Fig. 1, Fig. 2).11 Therefore, it is imperative that clinical and laboratory procedures, including taking the final impression and fabricating the master cast, be executed in such a way as to optimize the fit of screw-retained prostheses.1,4,8,9

Numerous impression techniques have evolved to improve accuracy.12-16 One technique involves tying open-tray impression copings together with floss, then splinting them together with self-curing resin. Another technique entails the fabrication of an implant verification jig (IVJ). In this procedure, a conventional implant-level impression is made and the master cast is poured. Temporary cylinders are splinted together on the model with resin or acrylic to fabricate the IVJ. The splinted assembly is then tried-in clinically. If the IVJ seats passively, the accuracy of the master cast is verified. If the IVJ does not fit passively, it is sectioned and reluted together in the mouth. The IVJ is then removed, implant analogs are attached to the copings, and the bases of the copings are seated in a stone base. Then, the IVJ is used to reposition the offending implant analog in the master cast. In both of these techniques, the copings are rigidly splinted together to prevent movement.

Following is a clinical technique we have found to be simple but accurate. It involves luting a sectioned IVJ together intraorally, then picking up the assembly with an open-tray impression technique.

PAGE 2 OF 4

In this case, six implants were placed in the patient's mandible to support a screw-retained denture. Following a four-month healing period, a preliminary implant-level impression was made and a soft tissue model was fabricated. Non-engaging temporary cylinders were luted together with Triad® Provisional Material (DENTSPLY; York, Pa.). A disc was used to cut thin slices between the cylinders, and the sections were numbered for easy identification (Fig. 3). A custom tray was then fabricated with access openings for the guide pins (Fig. 4).

Clinical Procedure
(Clinical dentistry by Drs. Hugh Murray and Al Manesh)

The healing abutments were removed from the implants (Fig. 5). The sections of the IVJ were seated as they were on the model and the guide pins were tightened (Fig. 6). If necessary, periapical radiographs can be taken to verify complete seating of the temporary cylinders on the implants. The custom tray was tried in (Fig. 7). The heads of the guide pins should extend through the access openings. The tray should be adjusted if it comes into contact with the guide pins or the IVJ.

NOTE: If an overdenture is the planned prosthesis, the custom tray can be border-molded following standard procedures.

The IVJ sections were then luted together (Fig. 8). Once set or cured (Fig. 9), the IVJ was removed and inspected. Additional material can be added, if necessary, to strengthen the joints.

NOTE: In this case, Triad DuaLine was used. The curing light provides an initial set. The assembly should be placed in the Triad Curing Unit for a complete cure.

PAGE 3 OF 4

The assembly was reseated on the implants. To verify a passive fit of the IVJ, one guide pin was tightened at a time. No lifting of the IVJ should occur (Fig. 10). The adjacent guide pin was tightened. The previous screw was removed and the fit verified. This procedure was repeated for each implant (Fig. 11).

Rope wax can be placed over the access openings to control excess impression material (Fig. 12). The intaglio surface of the tray was painted with adhesive. Impression material was injected under the IVJ (Fig. 13).

NOTE: This is important: The area under the IVJ should be completely filled with impression material to capture the soft tissue contours.

The filled tray was completely seated, ensuring that the guide pins extended through the access openings (Fig. 14). Once the impression material had set and the guide pins were completely loosened (Fig. 15), the impression was carefully removed and examined for accuracy (Fig. 16). The IVJ was picked up in the impression.

NOTE: The non-engaging cylinders allow the impression to be pulled even if the implants are divergent.

Master Cast Fabrication
Implant analogs were seated on the temporary cylinders and the guide pins were tightened. A soft tissue model was poured (Fig. 17).

Precautions
While this technique is relatively straightforward, there are situations that could complicate the procedure. The patient must have adequate vertical opening to accommodate the guide pins. The more posterior the implants, the more challenging it can become to seat the tall guide pins. Shorter screws may be an option.

PAGE 4 OF 4

If there are trajectory issues, angle-shouldered/multi-unit abutments may be required.

In these cases, the final impression should be made at the abutment level, rather than at the implant level. Whether angled abutments are necessary can be determined by working the case up through a trial denture set-up. The trajectory of the implant can then be evaluated in relation to the positions of the teeth to be replaced on the model. Once the appropriate abutments are selected, the sectioned IVJ and custom tray can be fabricated and the final impression made.

Conclusion
Splinting temporary cylinders together intraorally and then picking the assembly up in an open-tray procedure provides an accurate impression technique. The combination of an extremely accurate impression and CAD/CAM fabrication of the framework has brought implant prosthetics to a new level. Taking one's time and paying attention to detail during the impression procedure will simplify the rest of the restorative process and result in a superior prosthesis.

References
  1. Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;79:74-78.
  2. Goodacre CJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Clinical complications of osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81:537-52.
  3. Jemt T, Book K. Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:620-25.
  4. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81:7-13.
  5. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-48.
  6. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;50:399-410.
  7. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto study. Part III: problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64:185-94.
  8. Cobb GW, Metcalf AM, Parsell D, Reeves GW. An alternate treatment method for a fixed-detachable hybrid prosthesis: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:239-43.
  9. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St Louis: Mosby. 1999;69:549-93.
  10. Watzek G. Endosseous Implants: Scientific and Clinical Aspects. Chicago: Quintessence. 1996:342-54.
  11. Ortorp A, Jemt T, Back T, Jalevik T. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont. 2003;16:194-200.
  12. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2008;100:285-91.
  13. Chee W, Jivaj S. Impression techniques for implant dentistry. Br Dent J. 2006;201(7):429-32.
  14. Cabral LM, Guedes CG. Comparative analysis of four impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent. 2007;16(2).
  15. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:216-22.
  16. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:448-55.

Featured Products and Services

 
  Screw Retained Denture
Glidewell Laboratories
Newport Beach, Calif.
800-854-7256
Screw Retained Denture Glidewell Laboratories
 
 
  Locator Bar Overdenture
Glidewell Laboratories
Newport Beach, Calif.
800-854-7256
Locator Bar Overdenture Glidewell Laboratories
 
 

Course Objectives (2 CE Credits)

Achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis is critical when dealing with implant-borne restorations. Thanks to CAD/CAM technology, extremely accurate implant frameworks can now be virtually designed and milled from a solid block of titanium. To optimize the fit of the prosthesis, clinical and laboratory procedures must mirror this high level of accuracy. Outlining a simple procedure for obtaining accurate full-arch implant impressions, this Clinical Tip describes how to:
  • Create a sectioned implant verification jig (IVJ)
  • Fabricate a custom impression tray
  • Lute the sectioned IVJ together intraorally
  • Verify the fit of the IVJ
  • Take the final impression
  • Fabricate the master cast

Summary

Even though CAD/CAM implant frameworks have greatly improved and simplified restoring full-arch cases, an extremely accurate impression and master cast are still critical for achieving a passive fit of the prosthesis. Detailed is a highly predictable technique for obtaining accurate full-arch impressions.

Click Here to Take Test

Technical Guides

 
  Locator Overdenture

Download PDF
 
 
  Locator Bar Overdenture

Download PDF
 
 
  Screw-Retained Denture
(Implant Level)


Download PDF
 
 
  Screw-Retained Denture
(Abutment Level)


Download PDF
 
 
  Screw-Retained Denture
(Glidewell Selects Abutments)


Download PDF
 
 
  Procera Implant Bridge - Premium
(CAD/CAM Ti Framework/ Ceramic Hybrid)


Download PDF
 
 
Click here to view all Removable Implant Technical Guides
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
Policies & Warranty   USA Flag
 
 
    Visit the aveoTSD website Visit the BruxZir website Visit the Inclusive Dental Implants website Glidewell Dental Lab Mobile Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on Facebook Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on Twitter Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on iTunes Visit Glidewell Dental Lab on YouTube
aveoTSD BruxZir Inclusive FastScan H/S Splint Facebook Twitter iTunes YouTube